Skip to main content

NC State Extension

What Are the Benefits of GMO’s for Less Developed Countries in Critical Need of Food?

en Español

El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.

Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.

English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.

Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.

Collapse ▲

According to Janet Carpenter in Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops published in the journal Nature Biotechnology, yield increases across several genetically engineered crops and technologies were 4.8 times higher (6% versus 29%) in developing countries than developed countries. This is most likely due to less access to other technologies such as pesticides in developing countries.

Growers in developing countries do not have access to proper safety equipment for pesticide applications. Genetically engineered products that reduce pesticide applications such as Bt cotton and Bt brinjal (eggplant) could have a much larger positive impact on human health in developing countries compared to developed countries. Kouser and Qiam reported that “Bt cotton now helps to avoid several million cases of pesticide poisoning in India every year, which also entails sizable health cost 1) Do you think that GMO’s pose a health threat to the general population? No, I do not think that GMO’s pose any more of a health risk than any other means of developing new crop varieties. The European Commission report A Decade of EU-Funded GMO Research came to this conclusion: “The main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than 130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research, and involving more than 500 independent research groups, is that biotechnology, and in particular GMOs, are not per se more risky than e.g. conventional plant breeding technologies.” This site contains links to similar conclusions on the safety of genetically engineered foods by major scientific organizations and societies.
Many people in developing countries also suffer from vitamin or micronutrient deficiencies. There are several projects using genetic engineering to increase needed vitamin and/or micronutrient levels in crops. Golden rice has been developed to have increased levels of beta-carotene, the precursor needed for humans to make vitamin A. About 500,000 people, mostly children, go blind every year in developing countries due to vitamin A deficiency. About half of those die within a year due to complications associated with vitamin A deficiency. More information about Golden Rice.

Keith Edmisten
Professor of Crop Science